Category-specific evidence and scores. This is not a universal company score.
Ingersoll Rand materially competes in the U.S. consumer/prosumer portable and shop air-compressor market with documented compressor specifications, ownership support signals, and at least one independent or regulatory cross-check.
Last verified 2026-08-20
Profile answer
Ingersoll Rand is not currently ranked in Air Compressor Companies with a score of 70.3 out of 100. Evidence coverage is 100% and confidence is high. This result is specific to that category's frozen rubric.
Rank not ranked | Score 70.3 | 100% coverage | High confidence
Ingersoll Rand materially competes in the U.S. consumer/prosumer portable and shop air-compressor market with documented compressor specifications, ownership support signals, and at least one independent or regulatory cross-check. [2]
Ingersoll Rand materially competes in the U.S. consumer/prosumer portable and shop air-compressor market with documented compressor specifications, ownership support signals, and a corrected successor-run independent or regulatory cross-check. [2]
Criterion score breakdown
Criterion
Weight
Score
Airflow and pneumatic-tool performance
22%
18.0
Recovery, duty-cycle, and pump durability
18%
16.2
Noise and work-area comfort
17%
9.2
Portability and jobsite usability
11%
4.2
Portable/shop portfolio breadth
10%
6.6
Warranty, service, and parts support
10%
8.4
Independent evidence depth and value
12%
7.7
Strengths
Ingersoll Rand receives 4.5 of 5 on recovery, duty-cycle, and pump durability based on its representative model evidence, compressor-specific documentation, and corroborating independent/regulatory context. [2]
Ingersoll Rand receives 4.2 of 5 on warranty, service, and parts support based on its representative model evidence, compressor-specific documentation, and corroborating independent/regulatory context. [2]
Ingersoll Rand receives 4.1 of 5 on airflow and pneumatic-tool performance based on its representative model evidence, compressor-specific documentation, and corroborating independent/regulatory context. [2]
Limitations
Ingersoll Rand receives 1.9 of 5 on portability and jobsite usability based on its representative model evidence, compressor-specific documentation, and corroborating independent/regulatory context. [2]
Capabilities
Ingersoll Rand receives 4.1 of 5 on airflow and pneumatic-tool performance based on its representative model evidence, compressor-specific documentation, and corroborating independent/regulatory context. [2]
Pricing
Ingersoll Rand receives 1.9 of 5 on portability and jobsite usability based on its representative model evidence, compressor-specific documentation, and corroborating independent/regulatory context. [2]
Support and warranty
Ingersoll Rand receives 4.2 of 5 on warranty, service, and parts support based on its representative model evidence, compressor-specific documentation, and corroborating independent/regulatory context. [2]
Disclosure: No material commercial relationship was declared for this research run.
Disclosure: No material commercial relationship was declared for this research run.